Saturday, March 31, 2007

Competition Skank! Competion Skank! Competition Skank!

Last Saturday was the Westheimer Street Festival here in Houston which is like a buffet of local acts for any music fan. While I'd hoped to at least catch a few bands, my 8-year-old hard drive (which I had planned on replacing in April) had other ideas. Thus my afternoon was spent rescuing data because there is nothing I love doing more than booting into the command line and entering Unix commands!* This is neither here nor there but I did regret missing a few acts especially when I saw this picture of Rusted Shut from ADR.


So, I began writing a post to a local board lamenting this when, on MyYahoo, I saw that there was an image of another band whom I was very happy to have missed at the same festival and I felt it was a funny juxtaposition of bands. I mean both bands have a shtick, sure, but while one lead singer looks like he got up from a bad night of drinking and likely would make you keel over if he breathed on you (Rusted Shut), the other was a spectacle of hippy-dippy shirtless narcissism. I posted the images with no other commentary other than "Cons - Missing this:" and "Pros - Missing this:" (a minor and I felt innocuous jab at best) and I got flamed for being meanspirited. Well, maybe I do have a mean streak when it comes to bands like that one but, by the same token, I have a mean streak against films like "Mr. Hollands Opus" and "Patch Adams". Yes, they have little effect on my life but I find them infinitely grating and worthy of ridicule; I just can't help myself. I can spot one of those movies a mile away and the same goes for bands whose hair is better than their music.

Am I being too Judgmental?

OK! I am pretty guilty of sizing-up bands and making snap judgments based on how they present themselves but I make no apologies for it because I think that to some degree there is some validity to my aversion for certain types of bands. Now, I'm not going to use the band from my post the other day because I pretty much had my say a year ago on them and have been pretty good about not beating up on them and this isn't really about them anyhow so, to illustrate my point, take a look at these two (we'll leave them unnamed) Houston and Austin bands:



OK, seriously, can go back to the Don Walsh Photo?



See. Is it only me? I mean, I don't know about you but I know which band I'd rather be listening to just from these photos. Am I being prejudicial? Sure. I just have this big aversion to bands with a stylist. If you look like you spend at least as much on grooming as you do on your equipment, you've got to overcome a big mountain with me because I like my bands stinky, sweaty, and ill-mannered or at the very least comprised of members with poor social skills and a fashion sense borne out of necessity. If you are in a band, you are there to make music not to fuck around with primping yourself. I don't mind you doing a stage show like Dio or go all Pink Floyd with the lights; there you are putting on a SHOW that hopefully will compliment the music! Yet, if the stage show is just making yourself pretty, my gut tells me the focus isn't the music, it isn't the audience, it's yourself.

The Great 1985 Metal Album Experiment

Maybe it all goes back to participating in the 1985 Metal LP experiment lead by my esteemed colleagues Mike Schaeffer and Brian Firr . Mike's idea was that there was not enough new metal in our record stacks so off we went to Sound Warehouse to buy a dozen metal LPs. Surely we could find at least one good album and expand our metal universe beyond Black Sabbath. Out of the stack, one album (and only one) stood out as the one that rocked while the rest were rubbish. Now mind you the albums were bought completely at random with no prior knowledge of any of the bands but I think it was pretty easy to figure out which LP was most likely to kick ass just from the band photos on their back covers. Here are two of the bands from that stack. One photo represents one of the 11 shitty albums and the other photo was the one gem. See if you can guess which one kicked ass based purely on the band images.

img.1



img.2
That's right, the ugly pimply-faced poorly dressed guys who looked like the guys you saw in the smoking section in High School. See what I mean? Don't lie, even if you didn't know that the latter was Metallica you'd know without hearing a note which band rocked harder. In fact the only thing you could say for bands like Keel and their ilk is that more than likely they got more action than Metallica. Fine, all I know is we went back and bought Ride the Lightning the following week and pitched the other albums in a field - case closed.

Maybe This is Purely an American Phenomenon!

I hear you, Echo and the Bunnymen had their goofy haircuts, Bauhaus wasn't far behind, and I'm sure you are thinking of a bunch of others who were great bands along those lines but those were English bands and the bands from the UK are simply able to get away with dressing up much more than we can. When we try to play dress up on this side of the pond this is what we get:

That's right, David Johansen in drag - easily the ugliest drag queen ever! Now if there was ever an award for band trying to find a look, failing miserably, and fooling nobody, it was the Dolls. Despite the bad drag and their best efforts, they still couldn't get the stink of a ratty New York bar out of that photo. I suppose that, in failing in a look, the Dolls succeed in being even more vile and skanky, and when you get down to it, skank is what Rock and Roll is all about. But some bands simply can't handle the skank and the result is this:

If you were around in the 90's, you could tell this band was going to suck eggs the instant you saw them. They could dress up all they wanted but these guys were from Minneapolis and, to this day, I sure as hell can't catch even a whiff of Schell from this photo. Husker Du, the Replacements, Prince, and The Time; each embraced their hometown skank in their own way. What does dressing Eurotrash have anything to do with Minneapolis? Nothing.

Rock Lives So Long as You Embrace The Skank!

Here is the thing. Rock wasn't some form of music that was sponsored by the elites of society, it was the bastard child borne from populist forms of music that no self-respecting white adult would touch in the 50s. It stunk, was boorish, ugly, and worst of all had the taint of the "lower" classes and races. Rock and Roll was simply too skanky to go over well at the Rotary Club unless they could get Pat Boone to butcher it.

Over the years, as rock has become just another genre with its catalog of tropes that could be recognized by anyone of the babyboomer or younger generation, it has lost its skank. In the place of skank is an SUV being sold to you with the Buzzcocks as background music. Gone are the days of radio banning instrumentals like Link Wray's Rumble and instead bands like Of Montreal can whore it up with a restaurant chain and nobody bats an eye since nothing sticks it more to the man than being on the man's payroll.

But don't call the mortician yet. You see somewhere in your city skank lives. This was reaffirmed for me when Rosa took me to Southmore House the other day. Inside was a scene that thrives despite zero local press coverage or respect. Here were a bunch of kids in a ratty building with spray paint on the walls and a bathroom that smelled worse than a drive through Pasadena's infamous refineries. The place was pretty hot and here it was only March but that didn't stop anyone. On stage and on the floor were Humanicide - a band that wore its politics on its sleeve as it ground out music that was loud, heavy, and fast. The heat, the sweat, the volume, the smell, and enthusiasm all without concern for fashion or approval told me that, contrary to a lot of literature, rock is not dead nor is it reduced to being a soundtrack to a consumer culture. As long as there are people who have music drip off of their sweat-drenched shirts every week, it lives.

I know it's only rock and roll but I like it, like it, yes I do.



Links:
Rusted Shut

Houmanicide
Gulf Coast Hardcore


Photo Credits in order:
Don Walsh image ADR
Penny Royal by Andaleeb Kazi (I mock the band but it is a nice photograph. I like the saturated color.)
Dames Violet by Brian Baggett
Keel, Metallica, New York Dolls, Information Society - Hey I tried to find th ephotographers but have had no luck. If anyone knows please let me know.
Humanicide at Southmore by Rosa Foto

* In case you are counting that's two Nappers whose computers have crashed in the span of a week.

21 Comments:

Anonymous Matthew Thurman said...

I agree...and disagree. I'm gonna go out on a limb, here...keep in mind that I'm not playing devil's advocate, no, I really feel this: I do not think THE SONICS were all that hot. Sure, there's dumb rock and then there's really dumb rock-the Ramones versus Whitesnake, for instance, but I just never really felt that the Sonics were on the good side of dumb. And part of this belief is based on exactly what you're espousing here. Have you ever seen pictures of the SONICS? Short hair, parted, combed, a sort of JFK look, if you will...khakis, Ivy League type sweaters...big squared jaw type dudes...I mean, they look like those hitler youth motherfuckers who beat up Otter in "Animal House." Plus, I just don't think they were really all that happening...quite honestly, I see them as the Limp Bizkit of the 60's, minus the record sales. Just dumb jocks going "Woooooooaaaahhhh!!!!"I know Ramon's gonna have an embolism over this one, but...you gotta admit, they looked like jerks.

March 31, 2007 1:59:00 AM EDT  
Blogger Electramummy said...

The Keel's "Tears of Fire" was responsible for popping alot of Aqua netted cherries.

March 31, 2007 4:04:00 AM EDT  
Blogger John Cramer said...

Wow, while the last Houmanicide photo is inarguably a great foto, it also looks like a bunch of guys laying it all on the line in a money-shot contest. That's a serious sausage fest going on there. It's like they are all practicing for the WWF or for the role of Superman at the very moment in the movie when Margot Kidder dies and Supes screams, "NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!" to the heavens.

Great post by the way.

March 31, 2007 11:51:00 AM EDT  
Blogger Kilian said...

I'm not much into stylized bands either but that's for kiddies anyway.

I do have a problem with under dressed musicians. Folks who go up on stage wearing their knee length shorts and tennies from a day spent playing video games in their living room. It is as much a statement as dressing up. Usually the music fits the musician too, boring.

Live music is church to me, dress up. You don't have to look like something out of a hair salon poster but good lord put some slacks on (good black ones from Target, 19 bucks, comfortable too).

March 31, 2007 12:09:00 PM EDT  
Blogger John Cramer said...

Fugazi would have to disagree with you there K. Me too. Although I do like the sentiment behind dressing up for shows, and have done so n occasion, to me it's utterly irrelevent if the band is good. It can be a statement but no statement is worth anything without someone else to absorb it. Music first, vanity second.

Having said that, it can be nice to have a sort of ritualized process for playing live, including "dressing up," as it can often put the players in a certain mindset, but I personally think that a well-dressed, shitty band sucks just as bad as a shorts-laden, shitty one, all else being the same.

March 31, 2007 1:20:00 PM EDT  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wow, fashion and music in the same blog. Cool! Now i know how to dress if i want people to come to my shows.

KC (from the No Sunshine Band)

March 31, 2007 1:53:00 PM EDT  
Blogger Electramummy said...

I'm still waiting for my hero band to come along wearing only potato sacks on their bods and paper bags on their heads.

March 31, 2007 3:02:00 PM EDT  
Blogger ms. rosa said...

ramon your point about the Dolls i thought was particularly 'on'. there is a Doll's documentary i learned about recently that is shot by none other than mr. rock and roll photography himself bob gruen. a friend described a scene where they are walking along in new york and people looking at them like they were space aliens. and their music was even better than their look.

so i don't see anything terribly wrong with stylized dressing unless it gets to the point that it eclipses the music. killian i know what you're talking about. i like formatlities as well.

i forgive The Sonics for looking fratty by today's standards because #1 they were ugly motherfuckers and #2 they wrote 'the witch' along with a fuckload of other rock and roll gems that put 99% of todays 'indie rock' in the '100% shit' category. looking cool embraced and transcended.

ha! so true about the kids in the humanicide picture. the scene is punctuated by girls but you're right - it's mostly a boy's sport. when i took this shot i was sitting at the edge of the stage, legs dangling with the band and fans on the floor in front of me inches from my face and the kids barely knew i was there. sheer luck that i caught one looking my way. oh and they were singing about being vegan. shirtless hippies!

March 31, 2007 3:26:00 PM EDT  
Blogger The Sparrows of Happiness said...

Hey Matthew "Wrong About The Sonics" Thurman,

I saw that dig at Wolfmother. You better watch yourself, or I will totally turn this into the Ronnie James Dio Trivia blog.

There is a funny post here
poking fun at more or less what Ramon is talking about.

But let's be honest - there have always been pretty boys in Rock & Roll. Hello, ELVIS? And what about the Beatles? Whatever you think of them, without those two acts rock & roll never would have been the phenomenon it was, and both of them relied, to some extent, on looks and fashion to make them what they were.

To be honest I can't fault the current crop of whiny, sensitive metero-pretty boy bands trying to wrestle the crown of Top Wuss from Morrisey too much for their deal, because after all they are just doing it to get laid and I am totally OK with that.

And you all just wait: I'm gonna start shaving, lose 30 pounds, put on an ascot and a cardigan, start my late-80s Austin scene tribute band, "Grains of Sincerity", and before you all know it I will be pulling enough booty to make Wilt Chamberlain look like a monk.

March 31, 2007 4:01:00 PM EDT  
Blogger John Cramer said...

Just make sure you keep the phony-tail. Lady legs fan out like butterfly wings for that shit.

I just threw up in my mouth a little.

March 31, 2007 9:06:00 PM EDT  
Anonymous Matthew Thurman said...

There was a dig at Wolfmother in my comment? Wow...I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. As for the Sonics? I just never really liked 'em all that much. Everybody thinks they're just the greatest, and i never really got it. But my point was that if Ramon and I were walking down the street and we were approached by them, Ramon would inevitably blurt out "Holy shit, Matthew...look at the fucking Young Republican glee club!", and I would laugh, and then they would bludgeon us with their rock. Well, Ramon would be rocked...me...not so
much. I think I'm probably more on the Kilian side of things, here-I like the dress up action. Can you imagine Hendrix or Keith onstage with shorts and a fucking baseball cap?

April 1, 2007 12:18:00 AM EDT  
Blogger Electramummy said...

I can imagine Hendrix on stage in anything, because that's the only choice I have.

April 1, 2007 4:04:00 AM EDT  
Blogger John Cramer said...

I wouldn't exactly say that Keith was dressing up, he just wore whatever he woke up in on stage. Had he been a shorts guy, it would have been shorts. Without minders he may have played nude for that matter. Now Mick is a different story (football pants anyone?). As for jimi, he wasn't human anyway so he doesn't really count. I like when people a little thought into their stagewear, I just think it should never overshadow the music.

Of course, all this makes me think of Pulp Fiction with the shorts and t-shirts scene. So yes Matthew, I guess that after all I'm with you on the fish out of water scenario.

April 1, 2007 11:12:00 PM EDT  
Blogger The Sparrows of Happiness said...

Matthew,

I thought your "Woooooooaaaahhhh!!!!"

was aimed there. I must be overly sensitive...it is a full moon after all. I'll agree to disagree about the Sonics.

One of my weaknesses as a musician is that I feel execution is a big part of the battle, so I give the Sonics props for pulling off what they did, even though other folk were doing similar things at the time.

So now I lay out a possible topic for future NAP writers:

Execution vs. Concept?

For example: The 13th floor Elevators were conceptually brilliant, but they always kind of sounded like shit on record. Whether because they were poorly recorded, or too stoned to play properly, or both, I don't know.

We have, in Houston's not so distant past, a prime example of this kind of band: Dry Nod - truly explosive, inventive, sonic, insane, explorative. But Dry Nod's deal was catching lightning in a bottle. What was cool about them was that they seemed to understand and embrace this. If you saw them at their peak, they were unstoppable brilliance, if not, they were unmitigated chaos, but they and their audience knew that one was impossible without the other.

So here's the question I posit to you NAPpers: How do you judge the contributions of experimental artists, who push the envelope but may not always achieve their goal in terms of execution, listenability, etc.? Should we give more love to Joy Division, who were brilliant but flawed, or Bauhaus, who were eminently listenable but who even at their best never reached JD's stark, unspeakable beauty?

When is it acceptable for music to rely on the intelligence and imagination of its listeners to complete its concept? Music which leaves completion to the listener invariably indulges the listener's conceit that they knew where the band was going: the audience completes the sentence for the band. Are we letting our experimental musicians off the hook here, by doing their work for them?

April 2, 2007 1:46:00 AM EDT  
Anonymous stacey said...

This reminds me of when people say they don't like performance art or modern dance. What they don't like is bad performance art or modern dance. The good is out there but it's hard to find. Music is more transportable and is so very viral. I think we are just lucky to have had both Bauhaus and Joy Division. People, in general, fight themselves to push themselves. It's freakin hard, man. One act I am so happy to have seen was Crash Worship. I actually got to open the doors and let them in to play and boy was I surprised, as I'd never heard or seen them before. Listening to them in the car? Doubtful it would be so interesting. In other news, my baby daddy said he would like to be led on to the stage with a giant metal mask on his face with just some holes to breathe through, and be led to a piano to play. And it would be some terribly raucous stuff that would then ensue. But he said that first he'd have to learn how to play piano.

April 2, 2007 4:00:00 PM EDT  
Blogger ms. rosa said...

sparrow you have the wrong 13FE records apparently. or you're wrong. but i bet you just don't have the right record. nothing concept about the brilliance of that fuckin' band. try getting the re-releases on Sundazed. 180 gram vinyl even.

April 2, 2007 5:32:00 PM EDT  
Blogger The Sparrows of Happiness said...

no dude I have listened to a lot of 13th Floor and I know it's heresy to say it, but I always thought they fell short on the execution side. Great f-ing songwriters, brilliant concept, but "Psychedelic Sounds..." which I owned for many moons until I sold it to Sound Exchange for beer money, reaches for the grapes but just can't grab 'em. Their later releases like Easter Everywhere sound like booze/pot fueled LP4 jams recorded on Ramon's old 6 track. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but I'm just saying... they brought the notion of Lo Fi to a new level. It's no slag against them as they were so innovative, really the fathers of Texas, and arguably all, psych music.

this is exactly why I threw this comment up here, is to get people thinking about the issue. Because personally I think 13th floor is a hugely important and influential band, but that's different from being a listenable band. Pere Ubu, DNA, Budgie, Beefheart, the Fugs, I mean I own a bunch of this shit but I can't put it on heavy rotation, lest the last shreds of sanity evacuate my hollow soul like grackles fleeing buckshot.

April 3, 2007 12:01:00 AM EDT  
Anonymous Matthew Thurman said...

No, I totally understand what SPARROW is saying...those 13th FLOOR records do sound like dogshit, but, I still like 'em, too, and I really dislike most lo-fi type of activity. But don't even get me started on BAUHAUS...I just thought they were so fucking cool...Joy Division attained more of a mythical status for a few reasons which shouldn't really apply...the singer dying for instance...but they were just too real of a band for most people to deal with. Still, if a gun were pointed at my head with the instructions to "pick one or else", I'd have to eat the bullet.

April 3, 2007 3:07:00 AM EDT  
Blogger John Cramer said...

I remember listening to Sparrows' copy of the 13FE and thinking that the jug player was going to curdle my brain. It reminds me of hearing the MC5 for the first time on my ROIR cassette. It was nothing like I imagined it to be. I was so used to the dense, distorted guitars of the 80's, so hearing the MC5 was a rather big departure at the time. When you take huge leaps in pop history, the gaps are noticeably absent. Sometimes I have to go back and listen to the intervening shit to get my bearings. Of course, in the end it's a win-win situation.

April 3, 2007 10:10:00 AM EDT  
Blogger ms. rosa said...

hear! hear! cramer!

April 4, 2007 12:48:00 AM EDT  
Blogger Carlos Anaconda said...

How does the gap feel when you hear the 13fe on a mac commercial on tv? like a gaping black hole.

April 5, 2007 12:28:00 AM EDT  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home