one year later.
Last year at this time I was cruising around the South Island of New Zealand, listening to A Tribe Called Quest with my punk rock friend. You might remember my New Year's resolution from the time, which was basically to stock up on historic music and spend more time listening to the essentials.
(Aside: Christ, there's some purple prose in that post.)
I don't know that that worked out very well, although I did pick up LIVE AT THE APOLLO. Paradoxically, I found myself paying closer attention to new music than I had in several years, which I credit in large part to my participation here and the podcasts.
This year at this time, I am in northern Michigan (Harbor Springs, in the northwest corner of the lower peninsula) with my family at my godparents' house. We drove up yesterday, and my brother and I found ourself in the front seat while my parents were in the back seat. This was unexpected, and so we weren't prepared with CDs for the car. But there were the albums that are always there, two albums I'd have mentioned several weeks back in the discussion about parents and their music tastes: Simon & Garfunkel's THE CONCERT IN CENTRAL PARK and the soundtrack to THE BIG CHILL. And, of course, these tracks have a lot of history and a lot of memories for me, being two of the few CDs that my parents listened to on a regular basis. (The third, JOHN DENVER'S GREATEST HITS, wasn't in its case.)
I'm interested in how music affects people, I have been for a long time. I think about that feeling singing along with a friend to "Luck of Lucien" on the South Island, or the happiest day I had in a long time when I was driving to a friend's house and the sun was setting and New Order's "Run 2" popped on the iPod.
If you think this is leading up to a description of how these tracks affected me, you're wrong, because they didn't very much, mostly brought back memories of the past, and my previous New Year's resolution.
Which encapsulates one of my major problems: feeling guilty or feeling responsible for something that should be pure, unmitigated joy. If I was trying to make a living as a music journalist or historian or musician or cognitive scientist, then maybe making resolutions about music would make sense. But ultimately it was just kind of silly. Arguably, most resolutions are, but this was sillier than most.
And so I make this year's resolution, which is to care less about what I'm supposed to do and feel more about what I am doing. I don't know that I can explain this very well, but it has to do with the sense, for instance, that I had a couple weeks back that I should quit this blog because of the responsibility. And now I think: fuck that noise. I mean, it's writing a little bit about music or whatever the hell once a week, it's not taking care of a child or something. The worst that happens if I completely fail is that you find some other way to distract yourself on any given Sunday. And you're all grown-ups (I assume). Not. A. Crisis.
So hopefully 2008 will see less self-directed guilt trips and less agonizing and more simple reflections on the joy of music. (It may even see the end of my island series!) At the risk of overcommitting, however, there's a good chance it will see another project rear its head.
I mentioned my interest in how music affects people. I really believe it does, I really believe it can change lives. Not necessarily in grand ways. But I really believe your outlook will change if you listen to nothing but death metal for a week, or listen to nothing but Bach for a week, or so on.
But belief is not enough. So I intend to try to prove it.
Over the course of the next year, I will attempt to find weeks where, for that week, I listen to a single artist with a focused vision and nothing else. This will be hard, given my vocation (especially as I'm cutting a music series from February to May) and will undoubtedly be sporadic. But I'm really interested. Because if I saw, ultimately, that my quality of life was better when I listened to Bach than when I listened to Damien Jurado, should that change my habits of what I listen to?
Anyway. If you have any nominations for what will henceforth be called The Wack Experiment (after Mike D'Angelo's similarly single-minded experiment in auteur theory), let me know. I'll probably have to gather music to make it happen. Excluded are artists who have significantly changed their sound over time (The Boredoms, Lou Reed, Neil Young). Or there's some where I'll skip outlying albums (i.e. Albert Ayler is in, but NEW GRASS is out).
(Aside: Christ, there's some purple prose in that post.)
I don't know that that worked out very well, although I did pick up LIVE AT THE APOLLO. Paradoxically, I found myself paying closer attention to new music than I had in several years, which I credit in large part to my participation here and the podcasts.
This year at this time, I am in northern Michigan (Harbor Springs, in the northwest corner of the lower peninsula) with my family at my godparents' house. We drove up yesterday, and my brother and I found ourself in the front seat while my parents were in the back seat. This was unexpected, and so we weren't prepared with CDs for the car. But there were the albums that are always there, two albums I'd have mentioned several weeks back in the discussion about parents and their music tastes: Simon & Garfunkel's THE CONCERT IN CENTRAL PARK and the soundtrack to THE BIG CHILL. And, of course, these tracks have a lot of history and a lot of memories for me, being two of the few CDs that my parents listened to on a regular basis. (The third, JOHN DENVER'S GREATEST HITS, wasn't in its case.)
I'm interested in how music affects people, I have been for a long time. I think about that feeling singing along with a friend to "Luck of Lucien" on the South Island, or the happiest day I had in a long time when I was driving to a friend's house and the sun was setting and New Order's "Run 2" popped on the iPod.
If you think this is leading up to a description of how these tracks affected me, you're wrong, because they didn't very much, mostly brought back memories of the past, and my previous New Year's resolution.
Which encapsulates one of my major problems: feeling guilty or feeling responsible for something that should be pure, unmitigated joy. If I was trying to make a living as a music journalist or historian or musician or cognitive scientist, then maybe making resolutions about music would make sense. But ultimately it was just kind of silly. Arguably, most resolutions are, but this was sillier than most.
And so I make this year's resolution, which is to care less about what I'm supposed to do and feel more about what I am doing. I don't know that I can explain this very well, but it has to do with the sense, for instance, that I had a couple weeks back that I should quit this blog because of the responsibility. And now I think: fuck that noise. I mean, it's writing a little bit about music or whatever the hell once a week, it's not taking care of a child or something. The worst that happens if I completely fail is that you find some other way to distract yourself on any given Sunday. And you're all grown-ups (I assume). Not. A. Crisis.
So hopefully 2008 will see less self-directed guilt trips and less agonizing and more simple reflections on the joy of music. (It may even see the end of my island series!) At the risk of overcommitting, however, there's a good chance it will see another project rear its head.
I mentioned my interest in how music affects people. I really believe it does, I really believe it can change lives. Not necessarily in grand ways. But I really believe your outlook will change if you listen to nothing but death metal for a week, or listen to nothing but Bach for a week, or so on.
But belief is not enough. So I intend to try to prove it.
Over the course of the next year, I will attempt to find weeks where, for that week, I listen to a single artist with a focused vision and nothing else. This will be hard, given my vocation (especially as I'm cutting a music series from February to May) and will undoubtedly be sporadic. But I'm really interested. Because if I saw, ultimately, that my quality of life was better when I listened to Bach than when I listened to Damien Jurado, should that change my habits of what I listen to?
Anyway. If you have any nominations for what will henceforth be called The Wack Experiment (after Mike D'Angelo's similarly single-minded experiment in auteur theory), let me know. I'll probably have to gather music to make it happen. Excluded are artists who have significantly changed their sound over time (The Boredoms, Lou Reed, Neil Young). Or there's some where I'll skip outlying albums (i.e. Albert Ayler is in, but NEW GRASS is out).


5 Comments:
Feministe has some suggestions for New Year's resolutions, just in case you want to trade out your own for another one sometime after January 13:
http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/12/29/your-assistance-needed/
I like the resolution "I'm going to let my anger do the work it was designed to do" but then again -- I haven't got the slightest idea what that means.
-- Sara
fyi - i have come within a hair's width of quitting too. i'm guessing this week's post about falling air-conditioners will be forgiven and i'll be able to refocus on music later.
i am a bit curious about your intention to focus solely on one artist. maybe three, completely unrelated would lead to different conclusions about the music? just a suggestion. having just organized a playlist for cocktails tomorrow, i find i'm still driven to eclecticism. what's this project from Feb to May? sounds like fun.
happy new year :-)!
Sara - My brother and I had much laughter over that link. Thanks.
BBODG - See, I normally live a very eclectic music life, so that's part of the immersion thing, is to try and avoid my natural inclinations. In general, I love it, but I think the only pure way to test would be by one artist.
The show - in each episode, they go to a foreign country, take a song by an NZ musician, and have a local musician/group re-interpret the song, with various other stories about local musicians along the way. I believe so far installments have included a Shanghai jazz band doing a rock song and a Bollywood interpretation of a singer-songwriter ballad. It should be really cool.
that show sounds very interesting.
I would also be interested to see where listening to one artist at a time will lead you. I think it would take discipline just to do that, not even mentioning the rest. As my taste runs to eclecticism, I would want you to run the gamut from all the styles of music. Maybe even in order starting with, what, renaissance music? But that may be too literal.
On an aside, ever read the orson scott card short story where everyone is raised to do one thing, and the story is centered on a young boy who's job is to create music? They never let him listen to any other music lest it taint his pure creativity. Very interesting.
This idea might put you right back on that island.
Your work project sounds cool too.
Actually the music project gave me an idea I might pursue along this line.
James Brown? I dig that album big time. That crowd hollers ten times louder than those hot-for-Beatles teeny boppers.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home