Monday, April 21, 2008

can you feel it?

I once was in a class with a speaker who would often speak in a foreign language for stretches at a time. This teacher claimed that, even though we didn't know literally what he was saying, that you could still understand the spirit if you would just listen. This is, I feel, first-class horseshit. Half the time, those of us who speak the same language don't understand what we're saying to each other, by accident or by choice. A quarter of the time, I don't know what I'm saying - I'm using words to try to figure out what I'm thinking, translate these feelings or intuitions or whatever into the structure that's most appropriate for the situation.

(I recall, for instance, an anecdote from Michael Stipe about why he was unwilling to explain lyrics; when he was younger, he became very emotionally involved in a Bob Dylan song, only to find out in an interview it was about a dead dog on the side of the road Dylan saw. And, again, this is a language that both, nominally understood.)

[Subpoint: buying a falafel the other day, I saw an interview with Stipe where he felt the need to explain that "So. Central Rain" was about a relationship where he slept with both the male and female members after the breakup and realized it was a shit thing to do. "I'm sorry", indeed.]

Back to where I'm going with this? Are there situations where, let's say, a singer is so powerful that his or her voice carries an emotion that stretches beyond the need for language to comprehend? Sure, I'm willing to accept that, but as an exception, not as a default. By and large, even if you get the vibe, the specifics are completely lost.

Inspired by my recent work editing a music show set in Brazil, I recently picked up Soul Jazz's TROPICALIA collection, chronicling the acts involved in this short lived movement (short lived because it was broken up by the military government by arrests and deportations). There's an amazing-looking 56-page book that accompanies it, which I hope to read thoroughly through some day.

I often sell what the record stores called "world music" short - which is to say, overlook and ignore it - a lot of the time because a lot of my engagement with music is verbal. Words hook with me more than melodies. But this time I decided to focus and listen. First of all, this wasn't hard because the music was very awesome. But also, I was trying to hear this music not just as pleasant celebration but as act of revolutionary opposition, something so threatening the government had to step in to shut it down.

The track that first jumped out at me - partially because versions of it open and close the album, and partially because it is catchy as fuck - is "Bat Macumba", performed by Gilberto Gil and Os Mutantes. It's the Gil version that stuck with me, which is used here as a backdrop for visuals of Sao Paolo:


Although some may prefer the live, extended and unduly jammy versions of the tune by Os Mutantes on YouTube:

And some people might even want to see Of Montreal prove yet again that their choices of covers (if not their quality of performance) far outstrips their songwriting otherwise (which cuts off before the end, for those easily annoyed by that type of thing):


Anyway, over days I came to decide that its inclusion as bookends on this compilation had to have some significance, that this was in fact the heart of the Tropicalia revolution, and that it must be not just a joyful little ditty but a true call to revolution. And even though the words sounded pretty similar and repetitive to me, I figured they had subtle variances I was missing out on. So, finally, I googled the lyrics.

The result was largely disappointing. I found no clear explanation, although I basically stopped after finding this page, which provides the following account of "Bat Macumba":

equally playful lyrics that (on account of the dropped syllables) reference, among other things: Batman, Afro-Brazilian religion, and -- according to a friend who speaks Portuguese -- a command to smoke dope.

And hey: ultimately, in 1968, this may have been enough to get the military government up in arms. All I'm saying is: not what I guessed from listening.

-----------------

On an unrelated note, and part of the reason the above may seem half-assed and inconclusive: last week seven people, six students and a teacher, died in an unexpected flash flood while canyoning. The teacher was also a member of a local hip-hop group who I cut a music video for a couple years back, which you can find here. I met Tony a couple times, and he was a very good guy, and although I hadn't seen him for quite a while, I am saddened quite a bit by this. I understand that he died trying to rescue one of the students, which I fully believe.

I wanted to write something more about this, but I don't really know what to say that wouldn't be wasting words trying to make sense of the bundle of feelings in my head. The only words that I can fully articulate right now, really, are the obvious: life is fucking precious. Make use of it.

14 Comments:

Blogger Carlos Anaconda said...

Sometimes having a good time together playing music is the most revolutionary thing people can do.

The history of the steelpan is a good example of gov't crackdown on music just cause they don't want their subjects having too much of a good time together.

April 21, 2008 10:39:00 AM EDT  
Blogger Wednesday said...

Odd that Dylan is Stipe's culprit since Dylan is a notoriously vague and obstructive interviewee who also dislikes explaining his lyrics.

I was struck last week with an opposite thought to your line here. We were watching Bjork's Wanderlust video with our neighbors and their three year old daughter, and as soon as Bjork started singing the little girl turned to her dad and said "this is a sad song."

It immediately occurred to me that the idea of sad and the idea of song are inescapable human conditions that are not learned. It also occurred to me that these are the true specifics.

I cried heartily to the Clancy Brothers' music long before I had any intellectual idea what they were singing about.

I don't know, from what I've learned on the NAP, you and I are worlds apart in how we appreciate music - that's interesting to me too.

Oh and as far as the music revolution. It makes me think about the songs that connected "us" as kids - what united us but that seemed like nonsense to the ADULTS. It could be more what the song is not than what it is.

April 21, 2008 10:49:00 AM EDT  
Anonymous Clay said...

It's weird how we seem to have an almost instinctual ability to interpret the mood of some music. How did that come about? Has evolution somehow wired our brains to respond in specific ways to different types of music? I would have sworn that these responses were all learned and probably cultural, but for the example of my almost-three-year old daughter.

One of her favorite CD's is the Last King of Scotland soundtrack. It has a bunch of really great African songs mixed in with some snippets of the original score that was composed for the movie. The score music is all really dark and scary sounding and accompanies a lot of scary and gruesome scenes in the movie.

Whenever she is listening to the CD, I actually have to come running in from the other room to skip those tracks for her because she gets so scared of that music. She will actually be on the verge of tears.

I wonder how our response to some music came to be so innate and universal?

April 21, 2008 2:11:00 PM EDT  
Blogger The Unspeakable said...

I am sorry about your friend Doug. Life is precious, and make use of it INDEED. I have a hard time with world beat music too, because I want to know what they are saying.. On the other hand, I LOVE to listen to rap and hip hop from non-english speaking societies because the last thing I want to know is what they are saying... Modeselektor and Die Fantastischen Vier are two examples I think of that I actually would like to know more about what they are singing... BUT GAWD, please don't let me know what King Orgasmus One is talking about... I can live without knowing.

And I think that the voice does have the ability to carry emotions which need no language to support... but interpretation and personal experience can take one man's tear jerker and make it another man's laugh track...

Sorry about your friend again.

April 21, 2008 2:39:00 PM EDT  
Blogger dd said...

Carlos, Truth. At some point hopefully I'll read this fucking book and report back. Not that it's not good, just that I haven't had time to read anything for an embarrassingly long time.

Ultimately, I think I mistook a decision to "put the same song on the album twice as far apart as possible so it doesn't feel repetitive" as a decision to single that track out as particularly pivotal in Tropicalia.

Wednesday, I think you can get an emotional vibe - sometimes, accurately. And sometimes you get a vibe and it's wrong. Or it's so vague that it doesn't tell you much. And I'm speaking specifically about actually interpreting what the person is saying. You may be able to tell that somebody is sad without knowing the words, just like you can guess if somebody's angry if they're yelling, but do you know what they're sad about? I guess what you're getting at is this is the first order of priority and the second order is the detail, but I disagree.

The reason I disagree is that communicating the emotion doesn't necessarily rely on language. I can cry and communicate sadness, I can scream and articulate anger. But language is being used to communicate WHY somebody is sad or angry or whatever.

I have some of my strongest emotional reactions to Explosions in the Sky, which is purely instrumental and therefore even less "interpretable".

The flip side to all of this is that, in my job, I often rely on transcripts for interviews. And I will often find something good on paper, like, "This was the best part of the whole thing." And then you listen, and it's tossed off and so bad in the delivery it's unusable. Ultimately, it's the marriage of language and delivery that is effective communication, be it direct or poetic.

Or maybe I have no idea what I'm talking about.

I guess the flip side is what Clay's talking about, which is the universal component of musical communication, which has nothing to do with language and everything to do with keys, tempos, timbres, et cetera creating a reaction. I think talented performers such as Bjork or, to use a prior example, Violetta Parra (dunno the Clancy Brothers but I guess them as well) are able to tap straight into that.

Clay, why don't you burn her a version of the CD with just the tracks she likes?

Unspeakable, thanks.

April 21, 2008 4:16:00 PM EDT  
Blogger dd said...

Wednesday, I wonder if Dylan was taking the piss in his interview and a young Michael Stipe didn't get it. Which would be even funnier.

April 21, 2008 4:21:00 PM EDT  
Blogger Wednesday said...

Or maybe I have no idea what I'm talking about.

I don't think that's it at all. You've given me a lot of mix cd's over the years and talked about a lot of different bands on this site that are of the word-heavy ( almost academic) nature. Most of it I've enjoyed and appreciated but not the sort of stuff that I find myself without guidance from somebody like you. It's not what I naturally seek I guess.

One of my first influences was the Talking Heads' 77. I didn't know at the time but David Byrne's writing method was to sing jibberish while working out a melody. Some where in there, a song would form almost simultaneously and with hardly any thought for the word-message. I just naturally went for that sort of thing. Even before I found that out, I was doing the same sort of writing too.

So I get what you're saying about the lyrical message but I weigh the importance differently. And I say that being a fan of writers like Dylan who I think you can study as a very lyrical poet - meaning you can find solid poetic substance in his songs. But also somebody who immediatly liked Dylan not for what he was saying but how.

April 21, 2008 5:12:00 PM EDT  
Blogger Justin said...

How did that come about? Has evolution somehow wired our brains to respond in specific ways to different types of music?

This has to be the case, but I wonder what the evolutionary advantage of hearing sadness in music is.

April 21, 2008 7:18:00 PM EDT  
Blogger Wednesday said...

Speaking of World Music and the Last King of Scotland...some of the music from tLKoS is from Tony Allen's album Jealousy/Progress.

That's a great album in its own right. I got it a while back because I heard an interview with Brian Eno, where Eno called Tony Allen the greatest living musician in the world.

April 21, 2008 8:17:00 PM EDT  
Blogger Wednesday said...

Interesting compliment to this thread.

April 23, 2008 10:38:00 AM EDT  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I've always wondered if our perception of music being either sad or happy is derivative of environmental cues.

What if it were possible to expose a person at the earliest onset to an experiment that would prove if our recognition of different musicical moods is biological or environmental?

I believe it's the latter. If one were shown dramatic events at a very early age while playing happy uplifting music and doing the opposite with funny or happy events, would it be possible for that person to percieve the opposite of what we understand?

I believe it is possible.


Frankie

April 24, 2008 2:13:00 PM EDT  
Blogger The Unspeakable said...

Frankie,

I associate most of the happy pop music that we were drowned by in the 80's with homicide... and car crashes and dead deer and child abuse and sexual assault and genocide and animal experimentation and genital mutilation and collapsing soccer stadiums and school shootings... and I am but one biological example in one singular environment....

April 24, 2008 3:27:00 PM EDT  
Blogger stacey said...

Is this something like when we smile, we're usually happy, but when monkeys smile they are about to attack?

no, I guess that's different.

April 24, 2008 3:50:00 PM EDT  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Unspeakable said...
Frankie,

I associate most of the happy pop music that we were drowned by in the 80's with homicide... and car crashes and dead deer and child abuse and sexual assault and genocide and animal experimentation and genital mutilation and collapsing soccer stadiums and school shootings... and I am but one biological example in one singular environment....

Wow!


Frankie

April 24, 2008 4:08:00 PM EDT  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home