Ladies and Gentlemen
I still don't have power, so I'm typing this on my phone. If you thought the Blogger interface was bad on your computer, then I would encourage you to try a it on a phone. For some reason I can only type in the "Edit HTML" tab.
I rushed home from work so I could get here before dark because it's a lot harder to feed my new red and black 100 foot extension cord out the window and across the way to another building when I can see what I'm doing and don't have to try to hold a flashlight between my ear and my shoulder, the way you would a phone when you need both hands for something else.
Then I rushed off to a co-working space which was showing the debate outside on a big, inflatable screen. This was the only way I was going to be able to see the debate. On the way I encountered a group of fifty or so bicyclists who had decided to take up all three lanes of the road, threatening to make me late. No good. I got in the left lane and forced my way through, as some guy yelled at me, "Hey man, this is a peaceful demonstation." To which I responded, "It's nothing of the sort. You're just blocking traffic. Share the road." I went around him and drove through their bike column, watching as they rode right through red lights, protected from the cross traffic by their sense of righteous indignation. I had no more time to deal with these idiots, so I continued rushing to the debate, where I could watch the candidates lie to me while in the company of beardy hipsters in tight pants. Has McCain actually been to Waziristan? Should Obama have gone to Afghanistan as chair of his subcommittee? Do pants need to be that tight?
After all this, it was a joy to watch Spiritualized play. Even if it was at the Meridean, my least favorite venue. Even if I didn't get their usual light show. Long, anthemic space jams were the perfect antidote to the previous hours' venom. I almost didn't go, but I'm glad I did.
I rushed home from work so I could get here before dark because it's a lot harder to feed my new red and black 100 foot extension cord out the window and across the way to another building when I can see what I'm doing and don't have to try to hold a flashlight between my ear and my shoulder, the way you would a phone when you need both hands for something else.
Then I rushed off to a co-working space which was showing the debate outside on a big, inflatable screen. This was the only way I was going to be able to see the debate. On the way I encountered a group of fifty or so bicyclists who had decided to take up all three lanes of the road, threatening to make me late. No good. I got in the left lane and forced my way through, as some guy yelled at me, "Hey man, this is a peaceful demonstation." To which I responded, "It's nothing of the sort. You're just blocking traffic. Share the road." I went around him and drove through their bike column, watching as they rode right through red lights, protected from the cross traffic by their sense of righteous indignation. I had no more time to deal with these idiots, so I continued rushing to the debate, where I could watch the candidates lie to me while in the company of beardy hipsters in tight pants. Has McCain actually been to Waziristan? Should Obama have gone to Afghanistan as chair of his subcommittee? Do pants need to be that tight?
After all this, it was a joy to watch Spiritualized play. Even if it was at the Meridean, my least favorite venue. Even if I didn't get their usual light show. Long, anthemic space jams were the perfect antidote to the previous hours' venom. I almost didn't go, but I'm glad I did.


12 Comments:
I have a lot of sympathy for those righteous cyclist being that I spent five years in a miserable commuting situation and the past nine months riding to work.
While it has been rewarding to bike, I can't help but get frustrated with how dangerous and lacking the Chicago infrastructure is to this form of commute (even with a sympathetic fellow biker as mayor) and how unaware the general car traffic is to the dangers they present.
This might sound silly and useless but I feel unfortunate to live at the end of an ultimately unrewarding era - having to deal with traffic, asphalt lots, sprawl and oil wars with the lingering question being how worth it has this been? I live in a concentrated city (albeit one with horrible traffic) unlike Houston. I'd ask you why you don't ride around? You never have very far to go really. But Houston isn't a place I figure anybody would live if they didn't have the benefit of relatively inexpensive energy (as I'm sure you are all painfully aware right now).
I do ride. And I agree that the city should be more bike friendly. However, I don't agree that the way to promote that idea is to piss off motorists. And make no mistake, that is the goal of these Critical Mass rides. It's totally juvenile. What possible good comes from making themselves a nuisance? If they want to make a difference they should all be going to city council meetings en masse. But that's, like, hard and stuff.
Did I miss you? When did you get there? I was there with Orion for the Wild Moccasins and we left before the political sporting match to go see the Taiko festival at the park which was pretty aces as usual.
My favorite cyclist story is about a guy I work with who rides his bike to work everyday. It's about 5 - 10 mile ride per day.
So one day he is riding along and, well, he has his own opinions let's say, but he knows the law. Some drivers do not. So one got a little upset and honked a lot or something, words were said while they were both driving, etc.
So, somehow, the guy in the truck pulls over, gets out, with his bat, and yells at him because he is a biker.
My friend gets off his bike and is so mad that he starts stomping over to the guy saying, "It's going to take a lot more than that MotherFucker!" The guy slowly backs up, gets in the car, and drives away.
And, back on the bike on the way to work.
Justin, that's exactly what a farmer would do if he's trying to get through a bunch of cows. Or sheep.
It's a delicate balance. It would be best if people stuck to the rules in major areas where people congregate. Just nice manners.
I don't agree that the way to promote that idea is to piss off motorists. And make no mistake, that is the goal of these Critical Mass rides. It's totally juvenile.
Chicago's Critical Mass does a ride once a month - the last Friday (which is when you ran into them so I guess it's the same in Houston). Yes there are some jerks that tag along but the overall mission seems right on. I think they should stay together, running lights if they have to for saftey reasons (having done the ride I see this as the best plan). But of course they should let cars pass them. Still they aren't out to wreck havoc and piss off motorists but to remind folks of alternatives.
Did I miss you? When did you get there?
I guess so. I got there just as the debate was starting, having been slightly delayed by the Critical Mass idiots.
Justin, that's exactly what a farmer would do if he's trying to get through a bunch of cows. Or sheep.
I think "sheep" is a pretty accurate description of these people.
I think they should stay together, running lights if they have to for saftey reasons
How is running lights safer than obeying them?
Still they aren't out to wreck havoc and piss off motorists
The guy I was having words with was so determined not to let me pass that he actually stopped in front of me, along with a couple others, who, amusingly, kept running into each other. These three were absolutely there to piss off motorists. It only takes one.
Again, I see this as not very productive for cyclists and, when there are a few idiots who antagonize people in cars, as there inevitably will be, it's actually counter-productive. Imagine how much more productive they would be if they all showed up to a city council meeting.
When you have that many people riding, it's just safer to stick together - it's way less chaotic.
They only do the ride once a month like I said so they try to limit any problems in that way (and I do believe part of their mission is to attend city council meetings).
Don't get me wrong, I've seen some cm folks do pretty stupid stuff but I don't think enough to negate what the group is doing. And the idiots are just that - they don't generally represent that organization. So maybe the idiots cause some counter-production but your encounter is trivial really (believe me I've seen them do worse).
In your case you were in a rush to get to the boringest debate ever ;)
And the idiots are just that - they don't generally represent that organization.
Those three may have been the only ones in the organization that wanted to harass people in cars, but when they acted, they became the de facto representative for the group. All anybody will ever know is that there were jerks blocking all the lanes. This is not trivial. It has already caused people to dismiss them (I'm one of them). And when that happens, you don't get them back. Now whenever somebody brings up issues like getting bike lanes, the response is just going to be, "I wish those selfish jerks would just shut up."
It's the same with any party. You don't dismiss the entire Republican Party, for example, just because Sarah Palin believes dinosaurs are pretend or because the Bush administration pulled a WoMD fast one on us or because...oh nevermind.
1) Palin believes in dinosaurs, she just thinks that existed concurrent with man, 6000 years ago.
2) I wouldn't dismiss an entire group because some of its members are loony. Lots of people would, though. Should they take that risk? Moreover, where are the people who are saying they disagree with the CM tactics? If nobody from the groups speaks out against the idiots, then that's a tacit approval.
The problem with Critical Mass isn't an organization but is instead some vague "ride to celebrate cycling and to assert cyclists' right to the road". So it's more a gathering of cyclists than anything else. Some will just do it for the ride, others will do it to make some personal political statement, and a few holier-than-thou assholes, empowered by group, will take it as an excuse to fuck with motorists because motorists may as well be satan.
Me, as a cyclist, I'd rather support a cycing group like say Rails to Trails (whose efforts I personally benefit from) than Critical Mass. The difference is one group actually sees solutions and gets them implemented while the other is a giant feel good event that accomplishes nothing but a mutual pat on the back.
I'll take the group that gets me a safe 1 hour bike ride to work safely, thank you.
Sarah Palin is a dinosaur.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home