<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hard to Find</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/2009/11/hard-to-find.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/2009/11/hard-to-find.html</link>
	<description>Music in Seven Days from Seven Writers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:42:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cramer</title>
		<link>http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/2009/11/hard-to-find.html/comment-page-1#comment-13005</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cramer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/2009/11/hard-to-find.html#comment-13005</guid>
		<description>Here in Houston, at the time that Duran Duran was at their peak of popularity, I would say they eclisped Def Leppard. Eventually, however, I think Hysteria blew it wide open.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here in Houston, at the time that Duran Duran was at their peak of popularity, I would say they eclisped Def Leppard. Eventually, however, I think Hysteria blew it wide open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/2009/11/hard-to-find.html/comment-page-1#comment-13003</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 06:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/2009/11/hard-to-find.html#comment-13003</guid>
		<description>Quite honestly, I like &lt;i&gt;Smile&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Rainbow&lt;/i&gt; more than &lt;i&gt;Pink&lt;/i&gt;, but you&#039;d be hard up to find a better example of 21st-century hard rock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite honestly, I like <i>Smile</i> and <i>Rainbow</i> more than <i>Pink</i>, but you&#8217;d be hard up to find a better example of 21st-century hard rock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrshl</title>
		<link>http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/2009/11/hard-to-find.html/comment-page-1#comment-13002</link>
		<dc:creator>mrshl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 05:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/2009/11/hard-to-find.html#comment-13002</guid>
		<description>3. I finally decided I do like Oasis. Well, I like their early hit singles at least. Also, I do like Meatloaf&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Bat out of Hell&lt;/i&gt;. And I also agree that the first time heard &lt;i&gt;So Divided&lt;/i&gt; I thought the whole thing was precisely as absurd as you suggest. But I had taken some serious pleasure in the previous two records. I guess I wasn&#039;t ready for them to turn it up to eleven. I&#039;ve tried several times to get over my initial distaste for the record. Just haven&#039;t been able to do it.

4. Yeah, I guess I would say Soundgarden, Alice in Chains, and Stone Temple Pilots are all hard rock bands. But my favorite, and probably least well known, example from the grunge-era are Screaming Trees. I loved &lt;i&gt;Sweet Oblivian&lt;/i&gt;. I jammed it a ton during my freshman year at college along with &lt;i&gt;Where You Been?&lt;/i&gt; Candlebox were basically a hair metal band, and certainly fit the 80s hard rock mold more than the 90s mold. I wouldn&#039;t include them here.

But, your point holds true. Soundgarden, Alice in Chains, and Stone Temple Pilots were hugely successful bands in the 90s. They&#039;re proof that hard rock bands didn&#039;t really die so much as alt themselves into continued success (albeit on a smaller scale). It&#039;s probably a symptom of my current yearning that I kinda miss, and, uh, respect STP in hindsight. 

8. I like Drive By Truckers, but there has to be Rock if we have Hard Rock, and I&#039;d place them in the former category. Same with Wilco.

The Yeah Yeah Yeah&#039;s first EP and LP are huge favorites of mine. And those recordings are certainly hard rock. But they&#039;ve pretty much transformed themselves into an indie pop band. Which isn&#039;t a bad thing for them. This year&#039;s record was a grower for me.

I have just added &lt;i&gt;Pink&lt;/i&gt; to my Emusic saved-for-later list. I had meant to check that out earlier. But forgot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3. I finally decided I do like Oasis. Well, I like their early hit singles at least. Also, I do like Meatloaf&#8217;s <i>Bat out of Hell</i>. And I also agree that the first time heard <i>So Divided</i> I thought the whole thing was precisely as absurd as you suggest. But I had taken some serious pleasure in the previous two records. I guess I wasn&#8217;t ready for them to turn it up to eleven. I&#8217;ve tried several times to get over my initial distaste for the record. Just haven&#8217;t been able to do it.</p>
<p>4. Yeah, I guess I would say Soundgarden, Alice in Chains, and Stone Temple Pilots are all hard rock bands. But my favorite, and probably least well known, example from the grunge-era are Screaming Trees. I loved <i>Sweet Oblivian</i>. I jammed it a ton during my freshman year at college along with <i>Where You Been?</i> Candlebox were basically a hair metal band, and certainly fit the 80s hard rock mold more than the 90s mold. I wouldn&#8217;t include them here.</p>
<p>But, your point holds true. Soundgarden, Alice in Chains, and Stone Temple Pilots were hugely successful bands in the 90s. They&#8217;re proof that hard rock bands didn&#8217;t really die so much as alt themselves into continued success (albeit on a smaller scale). It&#8217;s probably a symptom of my current yearning that I kinda miss, and, uh, respect STP in hindsight. </p>
<p>8. I like Drive By Truckers, but there has to be Rock if we have Hard Rock, and I&#8217;d place them in the former category. Same with Wilco.</p>
<p>The Yeah Yeah Yeah&#8217;s first EP and LP are huge favorites of mine. And those recordings are certainly hard rock. But they&#8217;ve pretty much transformed themselves into an indie pop band. Which isn&#8217;t a bad thing for them. This year&#8217;s record was a grower for me.</p>
<p>I have just added <i>Pink</i> to my Emusic saved-for-later list. I had meant to check that out earlier. But forgot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cramer</title>
		<link>http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/2009/11/hard-to-find.html/comment-page-1#comment-13001</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cramer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 04:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/2009/11/hard-to-find.html#comment-13001</guid>
		<description>Oh definitely not useless. If we&#039;re discussing it it was well done if you ask me. Are you familiar with Torche, by the way? If not, check them out. They have a lot in common with the sound of the latest Baroness record. By the way, Baroness will be here sometime this month (I forget the day).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh definitely not useless. If we&#8217;re discussing it it was well done if you ask me. Are you familiar with Torche, by the way? If not, check them out. They have a lot in common with the sound of the latest Baroness record. By the way, Baroness will be here sometime this month (I forget the day).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/2009/11/hard-to-find.html/comment-page-1#comment-13000</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 04:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/2009/11/hard-to-find.html#comment-13000</guid>
		<description>1. Baroness definitely fits best in the metal category, but there is also some stuff that they do that is not very metal, particularly the drumming, as well as the way some of the quieter songs are put together. The bellowing vocals on the loud stuff push it toward metal, but if they didn&#039;t have that, I think there&#039;d be a much better case for them being &quot;hard rock.&quot; Other bands exist that might be even better examples for this hard rock/metal line-walking, like Red Fang and the Sword. Not that I&#039;m endorsing the Sword&#039;s music.

The other thing is that there is a lot of aesthetic variation within some of these stoner-metal records. For example, Torche: &quot;Across the Shields&quot; sounds like hard rock in the same way as QOTSA, but &quot;Healer&quot; is just too fast. 

2. I probably shouldn&#039;t have mentioned the Vines, because I actually haven&#039;t listened to that record much or recently. But I remember liking it.

3. I dunno man. Do you like Oasis? Or Meat Loaf? Then again, I don&#039;t. So Divided just seems like such a perfect example to me of how over-the-top and self-important Trail of Dead are. It just crosses so many lines of taste. I mean, doing a GBV song as an ultra-multitracked, hugely pompous march? That takes balls. I think So Divided does for me what the Darkness does for some other people, because I definitely laughed in disbelief more than once the first time I heard it. 

I can&#039;t even imagine what it would be like to watch them do those songs live, because they suck so bad at actually playing. The record is produced far past the point of self-parody, but at the same time it really sounds good. I just can&#039;t believe they pulled it off.          

4. Putting the hard rock label on Dinosaur calls into question the whole idea that alt-rock had any kind of negative impact on hard rock. But then, I&#039;m inclined to welcome that: what were Soundgarden, Alice in Chains and Candlebox but hard-rock bands?

5. I hated Awesome Color when I saw them the first time too, and I wasn&#039;t into what I heard from the first record, but Aborigines has some great stuff on it. 

6. I had initially listed the Raconteurs, because I&#039;ve seen them, but the White Strips seemed like an even better example. 

7. I heard Wolfmother cover &quot;Wuthering Heights&quot; by Kate Bush as I was walking by their show at Stubb&#039;s a while back. It was weird.

8. How about the Drive-By Truckers? I think they&#039;re a little overrated, but the hard rock label seems to fit them. What about Wilco&#039;s louder material? What about the Yeah Yeah Yeahs? I don&#039;t know that you could call their music punk anymore. Also, it&#039;s completely incredible that we haven&#039;t talked about Boris in this thread yet. I assume you&#039;ve heard Pink?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Baroness definitely fits best in the metal category, but there is also some stuff that they do that is not very metal, particularly the drumming, as well as the way some of the quieter songs are put together. The bellowing vocals on the loud stuff push it toward metal, but if they didn&#8217;t have that, I think there&#8217;d be a much better case for them being &#8220;hard rock.&#8221; Other bands exist that might be even better examples for this hard rock/metal line-walking, like Red Fang and the Sword. Not that I&#8217;m endorsing the Sword&#8217;s music.</p>
<p>The other thing is that there is a lot of aesthetic variation within some of these stoner-metal records. For example, Torche: &#8220;Across the Shields&#8221; sounds like hard rock in the same way as QOTSA, but &#8220;Healer&#8221; is just too fast. </p>
<p>2. I probably shouldn&#8217;t have mentioned the Vines, because I actually haven&#8217;t listened to that record much or recently. But I remember liking it.</p>
<p>3. I dunno man. Do you like Oasis? Or Meat Loaf? Then again, I don&#8217;t. So Divided just seems like such a perfect example to me of how over-the-top and self-important Trail of Dead are. It just crosses so many lines of taste. I mean, doing a GBV song as an ultra-multitracked, hugely pompous march? That takes balls. I think So Divided does for me what the Darkness does for some other people, because I definitely laughed in disbelief more than once the first time I heard it. </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t even imagine what it would be like to watch them do those songs live, because they suck so bad at actually playing. The record is produced far past the point of self-parody, but at the same time it really sounds good. I just can&#8217;t believe they pulled it off.          </p>
<p>4. Putting the hard rock label on Dinosaur calls into question the whole idea that alt-rock had any kind of negative impact on hard rock. But then, I&#8217;m inclined to welcome that: what were Soundgarden, Alice in Chains and Candlebox but hard-rock bands?</p>
<p>5. I hated Awesome Color when I saw them the first time too, and I wasn&#8217;t into what I heard from the first record, but Aborigines has some great stuff on it. </p>
<p>6. I had initially listed the Raconteurs, because I&#8217;ve seen them, but the White Strips seemed like an even better example. </p>
<p>7. I heard Wolfmother cover &#8220;Wuthering Heights&#8221; by Kate Bush as I was walking by their show at Stubb&#8217;s a while back. It was weird.</p>
<p>8. How about the Drive-By Truckers? I think they&#8217;re a little overrated, but the hard rock label seems to fit them. What about Wilco&#8217;s louder material? What about the Yeah Yeah Yeahs? I don&#8217;t know that you could call their music punk anymore. Also, it&#8217;s completely incredible that we haven&#8217;t talked about Boris in this thread yet. I assume you&#8217;ve heard Pink?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrshl</title>
		<link>http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/2009/11/hard-to-find.html/comment-page-1#comment-12999</link>
		<dc:creator>mrshl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 04:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/2009/11/hard-to-find.html#comment-12999</guid>
		<description>No, I can definitely see the humor in it. I think half the fun of this post was discussing something in a way that was so at odds with the subject.

If I&#039;m defensive, I should apologize. I&#039;m just saying I understand both the limitations and irony of my approach here. But I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a useless exercise. If nothing else, I got a pretty decent playlist for next week just from reading Danny&#039;s responses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I can definitely see the humor in it. I think half the fun of this post was discussing something in a way that was so at odds with the subject.</p>
<p>If I&#8217;m defensive, I should apologize. I&#8217;m just saying I understand both the limitations and irony of my approach here. But I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a useless exercise. If nothing else, I got a pretty decent playlist for next week just from reading Danny&#8217;s responses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cramer</title>
		<link>http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/2009/11/hard-to-find.html/comment-page-1#comment-12998</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cramer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 04:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/2009/11/hard-to-find.html#comment-12998</guid>
		<description>Marshall, my point was more along the lines that - at least for me - reading your chart came off somewhat dry and academic, which stands (again, for me), as a humorous counterpoint to the actual joys of listening to the music you are writing about. Sorry if it bothered you somehow. It was meant more in humor than as an affront. Charts have a tendency to come of as professorish, and not particularly Guns &amp; Roses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marshall, my point was more along the lines that &#8211; at least for me &#8211; reading your chart came off somewhat dry and academic, which stands (again, for me), as a humorous counterpoint to the actual joys of listening to the music you are writing about. Sorry if it bothered you somehow. It was meant more in humor than as an affront. Charts have a tendency to come of as professorish, and not particularly Guns &amp; Roses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrshl</title>
		<link>http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/2009/11/hard-to-find.html/comment-page-1#comment-12997</link>
		<dc:creator>mrshl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 03:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/2009/11/hard-to-find.html#comment-12997</guid>
		<description>Just a few comments.

1) I love both Baroness records, but I put them squarely in the Metal category. Indeed, Priestess&#039;s shift towards metal was decidedly in the direction of Baroness, and they couldn&#039;t have picked a better role model.

2) Wait, the Vines are good? I&#039;ll have to check them out. Based on early hype alone, I&#039;d decided to ignore them as major label Strokes rip-offs. Or was that another band?

3) Love Trail of Dead, especially Source Tags and Codes and Worlds Apart but I HATED &quot;So Divided&quot;. You&#039;ll have to tell me the secret to getting into that record. 

4) Dinosaur Jr. have actually been featured on Guitar Hero, and I think they&#039;re pretty squarely a hard rock band. They might actually bristle if you said otherwise. Bummed I didn&#039;t think of them when I was writing this post.

5) Awesome Color were pretty hard rockin&#039;, but they bored the hell out of me when I saw them play at The Mink. Interminable songs with very little substance or melody. I&#039;d rather watch a jam band.

Good call on the White Stripes, though. They&#039;re pretty much exactly what I&#039;m talking about, but I failed to mention them. Probably because I&#039;ve never been that big a fan (and the songs I do like by them tend to not be their rockers). So maybe I don&#039;t want what I say I want. Wolfmother, too, are trying hard to fill the void. But they&#039;re an awful, awful rock band.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a few comments.</p>
<p>1) I love both Baroness records, but I put them squarely in the Metal category. Indeed, Priestess&#8217;s shift towards metal was decidedly in the direction of Baroness, and they couldn&#8217;t have picked a better role model.</p>
<p>2) Wait, the Vines are good? I&#8217;ll have to check them out. Based on early hype alone, I&#8217;d decided to ignore them as major label Strokes rip-offs. Or was that another band?</p>
<p>3) Love Trail of Dead, especially Source Tags and Codes and Worlds Apart but I HATED &#8220;So Divided&#8221;. You&#8217;ll have to tell me the secret to getting into that record. </p>
<p>4) Dinosaur Jr. have actually been featured on Guitar Hero, and I think they&#8217;re pretty squarely a hard rock band. They might actually bristle if you said otherwise. Bummed I didn&#8217;t think of them when I was writing this post.</p>
<p>5) Awesome Color were pretty hard rockin&#8217;, but they bored the hell out of me when I saw them play at The Mink. Interminable songs with very little substance or melody. I&#8217;d rather watch a jam band.</p>
<p>Good call on the White Stripes, though. They&#8217;re pretty much exactly what I&#8217;m talking about, but I failed to mention them. Probably because I&#8217;ve never been that big a fan (and the songs I do like by them tend to not be their rockers). So maybe I don&#8217;t want what I say I want. Wolfmother, too, are trying hard to fill the void. But they&#8217;re an awful, awful rock band.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/2009/11/hard-to-find.html/comment-page-1#comment-12996</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 01:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/2009/11/hard-to-find.html#comment-12996</guid>
		<description>I think Trey probably said they were the first band to &quot;have their own airplane,&quot; which I misinterpreted to mean they owned one . . . now I know better.

I&#039;m perfectly comfortable with sales figures as a measure of &quot;hugeness,&quot; which is what you claimed (PREPOSTEROUSLY! ;))Duran Duran had in excess of Def Leppard. So that makes Alanis Morissette &quot;huger&quot; than Leppard. . . so what? I never said anything about &quot;cultural impact&quot; (which, if such a thing actually exists, Morrisette has had in spades, judging from the Avril Lavigne=&gt; Hannah Montana=&gt; Taylor Swift line of pop). I just said hard rock was mainstream popular music in the &#039;80s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Trey probably said they were the first band to &#8220;have their own airplane,&#8221; which I misinterpreted to mean they owned one . . . now I know better.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m perfectly comfortable with sales figures as a measure of &#8220;hugeness,&#8221; which is what you claimed (PREPOSTEROUSLY! <img src='http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> )Duran Duran had in excess of Def Leppard. So that makes Alanis Morissette &#8220;huger&#8221; than Leppard. . . so what? I never said anything about &#8220;cultural impact&#8221; (which, if such a thing actually exists, Morrisette has had in spades, judging from the Avril Lavigne=&gt; Hannah Montana=&gt; Taylor Swift line of pop). I just said hard rock was mainstream popular music in the &#8217;80s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrshl</title>
		<link>http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/2009/11/hard-to-find.html/comment-page-1#comment-12995</link>
		<dc:creator>mrshl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 01:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/2009/11/hard-to-find.html#comment-12995</guid>
		<description>My memories of the time period are based strictly on skating rink playlists, and by that measure, Def Leppard were a much bigger band. I&#039;m sure Duran Duran were bigger in the clubs. So, I&#039;d say the question of who was bigger may depend quite a bit on the demographic prism one chooses to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My memories of the time period are based strictly on skating rink playlists, and by that measure, Def Leppard were a much bigger band. I&#8217;m sure Duran Duran were bigger in the clubs. So, I&#8217;d say the question of who was bigger may depend quite a bit on the demographic prism one chooses to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

