<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Volume addict in a shared space</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/2010/01/volume-addict-in-a-shared-space.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/2010/01/volume-addict-in-a-shared-space.html</link>
	<description>Music in Seven Days from Seven Writers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:42:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Found in the Alley</title>
		<link>http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/2010/01/volume-addict-in-a-shared-space.html/comment-page-1#comment-13340</link>
		<dc:creator>Found in the Alley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 15:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/?p=3225#comment-13340</guid>
		<description>Replace the word loudness with dynamics in your post and it might come close to my sentiments. Dynamics, which takes a lot more cooperation, can make the number seven on the volume knob sound like eleven.

My musical coming out was in a very loud crowd (mid-80&#039;s thrash/punk). Singing was often inaudible and otherwise incomprehensible. If it was ever an issue it wasn&#039;t ever addressed probably because a prevailing phony sentiment of the time was &quot;F U&quot; anyway. 

So I guess for me, examples of sheer loud awesomeness aren&#039;t persuasive; they are the exceptions that prove the rule. I&#039;ve also found that loud bands don&#039;t start out that way. They suck first. Then individual players, often multiple within the same band, say f*ck it I&#039;m going to have my fun. And the audience is blessed with something equivalent to five egotistical actors on stage giving individual monologues simultaneously and without correlation.

Long monologues and no responses. All tweeting and no listening. The question really is: can &lt;em&gt;you&lt;/em&gt; hear the singer and do you care?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Replace the word loudness with dynamics in your post and it might come close to my sentiments. Dynamics, which takes a lot more cooperation, can make the number seven on the volume knob sound like eleven.</p>
<p>My musical coming out was in a very loud crowd (mid-80&#8242;s thrash/punk). Singing was often inaudible and otherwise incomprehensible. If it was ever an issue it wasn&#8217;t ever addressed probably because a prevailing phony sentiment of the time was &#8220;F U&#8221; anyway. </p>
<p>So I guess for me, examples of sheer loud awesomeness aren&#8217;t persuasive; they are the exceptions that prove the rule. I&#8217;ve also found that loud bands don&#8217;t start out that way. They suck first. Then individual players, often multiple within the same band, say f*ck it I&#8217;m going to have my fun. And the audience is blessed with something equivalent to five egotistical actors on stage giving individual monologues simultaneously and without correlation.</p>
<p>Long monologues and no responses. All tweeting and no listening. The question really is: can <em>you</em> hear the singer and do you care?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

