<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#8217;s group source think jerk some open source thingamabobs.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/2010/03/lets-group-source-think-jerk-some-open-source-thingamabobs.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/2010/03/lets-group-source-think-jerk-some-open-source-thingamabobs.html</link>
	<description>Music in Seven Days from Seven Writers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:48:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Found in the Alley</title>
		<link>http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/2010/03/lets-group-source-think-jerk-some-open-source-thingamabobs.html/comment-page-1#comment-13811</link>
		<dc:creator>Found in the Alley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 17:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/?p=3647#comment-13811</guid>
		<description>The chuck platform leaves a lot to be desired but I&#039;m excited about the prospects as a coder.

In software developer world there are a myriad ways to do stuff. Take Flash for example: you can take a very visual approach to building in Flash or you can use their coding language. The coding language ultimately is a lot more powerful and also allows for a lot of shortcuts or global changes. 

It&#039;s a different approach not necessarily a better one but it will certainly result in different outcomes. I think if you did this stuff for a while you would always be able to tell what was performed by live coding versus a knob (for example).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The chuck platform leaves a lot to be desired but I&#8217;m excited about the prospects as a coder.</p>
<p>In software developer world there are a myriad ways to do stuff. Take Flash for example: you can take a very visual approach to building in Flash or you can use their coding language. The coding language ultimately is a lot more powerful and also allows for a lot of shortcuts or global changes. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a different approach not necessarily a better one but it will certainly result in different outcomes. I think if you did this stuff for a while you would always be able to tell what was performed by live coding versus a knob (for example).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/2010/03/lets-group-source-think-jerk-some-open-source-thingamabobs.html/comment-page-1#comment-13809</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 02:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonalignmentpact.com/?p=3647#comment-13809</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand the point of the live coding.  You know what works really well as a real time interface?  A knob.  Live coding just seems incredibly inefficient and isn&#039;t an improvement on a knob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand the point of the live coding.  You know what works really well as a real time interface?  A knob.  Live coding just seems incredibly inefficient and isn&#8217;t an improvement on a knob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

