Ruminations on Medications

Hello, NAP, and thank you for having me yet again. On my first post as a provisional replacement for Roberto, I’m not going to attempt anything grandiose or topical; I’m just going to talk about a record that’s been on my mind lately:

Completely Removed, by Medications

I was introduced to this band by Wade Allen, the guitar player in Honey & Salt, which is one of the bands I’m playing with in Austin. The two main guys in Medications, both multi-instrumentalists, are named Chad Molter and Devin Ocampo. They’ve been playing together for a long time, and about ten years ago they were in a band called Faraquet. As I implied in my review of Completely Removed, I saw Faraquet when they opened for Fugazi in Atlanta in 1999.

This was one of those experiences where you realize only slowly that you’re impressed. I remember thinking that I couldn’t figure out how they were producing all those notes with only one guitarist, who from what I could see at the side of the stage, didn’t look like he was doing all that much. When I swung around to look, I could see that he was rapidly- very rapidly- picking out notes in the chords he was fingering. You can sort of see an example here, though it’s difficult to make out Ocampo’s hands from this distance.


(This is from a reunion concert in 2008. The interwebs seem to be devoid of footage from their first go-round.)

I thought this was pretty nuts at the time. I bought the only record they had, which was a split with Akarso, and I listened to it a LOT. I had never heard any punk rock with the density of notes that Ocampo was pulling off. In fact, I think this may have been the first math-rock record I ever owned (if you don’t count Sunny Day Real Estate or Midiron Blast Shaft, which you really shouldn’t). I used to play along to “Yo-Yo” on my drums, trying to figure out all the weird timing changes without actually working them out on paper beforehand, which went about as well as you can imagine, but was a fun challenge.

Naturally, when a full-length Faraquet release was announced in 2000, it was hotly anticipated (by me). And some other people too; I remember that when my friend Viki came back to Rice from Christmas vacation in DC, she complained (quite rightly, in my opinion) that some of her friends thought Faraquet superior even to Fugazi. BLASPHEMY. Anyway, when the record, The View From This Tower, came out, I was a little disappointed. Not enough rapid-fire arpeggiating or jazzy drum fills; too many horns, cellos, and other fixings. Ocampo played a rambling, slack drum solo at the end of a boring slow song. I kind of thought there was a lot of junk on the record.

In retrospect, one thing that prevented me from enjoying the record was J. Robbins’s production, in particular his smacky drum sounds, which don’t fit Molter’s drumming to begin with and don’t work well with the subtle, varied arrangements on the album. Another was that Faraquet was looking beyond first-wave math-rock to the more complex and experimental stuff that was coming in the next decade. I couldn’t appreciate that at the time- looking back, Tower was fairly forward-thinking in that way. Other people did appreciate it, and the record became sort of a cult hit. But Faraquet broke up the next year without even doing a proper tour, and personally, I more or less forgot about them.

Flash forward 9 years, and Wade tells me how great Medications are. Well, I did pick their first LP, Your Favorite People All In One Place, as one of the best math-rock records of the last decade. But, second-guessing myself again, I think that spot probably belongs to Faraquet instead. People has more of what I was originally looking for from a Faraquet LP, but as it turns out, that’s not as great as I thought it would be, and besides, after five years, other bands had caught up to (or rocketed past) Ocampo and Molter. People is not a pioneering record.

Also, I saw Medications during SXSW in 2009, and to be honest, I though they kind of sucked. Certainly it was nothing like the revelatory experience of watching Faraquet ten years earlier, and for that I’m not taking responsibility. They were boring. After that I re-wrote them off.

So, it’s March 2010, and Wade tells me, the new Medications record is SO GOOD. I’m skeptical. A month later, I get around to downloading it. And what the fuck, WHERE did this shit come from. This is hands-down the catchiest, most streamlined, most well-constructed math-rock record I’ve heard in years. D.C. indie rock has always had a respect for songwriting that contributed to its popularity, and Completely Removed exemplifies that tendency to an extent that few bands from the capital have in the last ten years. When combined with the band’s complicated, off-kilter rhythms and guitar arrangements, this commitment to songwriting also allows the record to function as a revitalization of math-rock, which, I have to say, has become somewhat decadent and obnoxious (bonus fat!)in the past few years, to the detriment of the music. I’m not prepared to say that this is the record that Faraquet should have made ten years ago, but this is certainly the reaction that I was hoping to have to that record.

One thing that I was surprised by when listening to this record is the way a little bit of a soul influence has crept into the band’s singing. This is easiest to hear on “Long Day-” this is a low-quality rip that’s been sped up for some reason, but you can hear what I’m talking about:

This is not something unique to Medications; the Dirty Projectors have also taken some steps in this direction, with confusing results:

And of course, there’s Pattern is Movement:

(Here’s what their original music sounds like)

I’m not entirely sure how I feel about this trend, but I do know that I prefer the Medications record to any of this other stuff.

Anyway, thanks to Wade for hounding me about this band, and thanks to NAP for having me back.

8 comments to Ruminations on Medications

  • Wade

    This is a great post, Danny. I’d like to comment on a few things.

    First, I’d like to be an apologist for Medications. I agree that their LP is not a pioneering record, but I still think you should keep their LP as one of the best math-rock records. It has a certain cohesiveness that Faraquet’s LP lacked. (On a side note, I don’t think it’s impossible to compare the math-rock of Medications to the math-rock of Hella, but they seem to be totally different species of math-rock, whatever the hell that means).

    Also, I think the ultimate reason why they were not that great at SXSW in ’09 is because they just lost their drummer, Andrew Becker. To see what they were missing, check this out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-TZHDpMatAM.

    After losing a drummer like that, I couldn’t really blame the guys for a “lackluster” performance. In fact, I wasn’t expecting MEDICATIONS, the original band, which is why I didn’t think they were that bad.

    I agree with you about everything with Medications’ new record, especially when discussing the commitment to songwriting as a breath of fresh air in the math-rock world. (Am I crazy to think that Maps and Atlases is not a math-rock band anymore? They definitely were ‘mathy’ on their first EP, but their last EP–Me and You and the Moutain–and their newer stuff is straight up indie-pop. Blah, I shouldn’t quibble about these things.)

    This really got me thinking about a lot of stuff, so it’s much appreciated Danny!

    • Daniel

      Holy crap, that song goes on forever. That’s one of the things that kind of puts me off about the Meds stuff with Andy Becker on drums, namely that the band is kind of long-winded compared to Faraquet. Also, I think Molter is a better drummer than Becker, and he’s CERTAINLY more valuable as a drummer than he is as a bassist; with Becker on drums he’s pretty well wasted in my opinion. As far as their performance last year, Becker quit way back in ’07, so they had plenty of time to get it together. No excuses! ;)

      In any case, I wasn’t trying to put down their stuff so much as set up the shock of CR being so good. Unfortunately I sort of ran out of steam toward the end of the post and that may not have come off as I’d hoped.

      On a not-entirely-unrelated note, how much had Q and Not U declined by the time the DC Burn to Shine video was shot? I love this song, but Chris Richards’ fucking asshole dancing just ruins the performance. Argh, dance-punk was SUCH a bad idea! Shame on my generation!
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUhz10lEyIw

      • Wade

        Yeah, that song is a bit long, and probably my least favorite on their EP. I agree with you that Molter is certainly more valuable as a drummer than he is as a bassist. It’s interesting that you think Molter is a better drummer than Becker–I’ll have to get you to elaborate on that in person.

        You’re right, I forgot that Becker quit in ’07, so they did have quite a bit of time to get it together.

        I have no idea how much (if any) Q and Not U declined by then. I lost track of them after Different Damage, but even then, I didn’t pay attention to them that much. In my opinion, they were best as a 4-piece from their first album, No Kill No Beep Beep. Yeah, I’ve never seen Chris Richards act like such a d-bag until I saw that video!

  • Wade

    Oops, I should specify that in the first paragraph I’m talking about Medications pre-Completely Removed and when I make reference to their LP, I mean their older LP, Your Favorite People All in One Place.

  • launchabomb

    Yeeeeeeeaaaaaahhhhh, I think this’ll probably be my favorite record for the year. It’s just straight up beautiful. Also, major bonus points for using vibes.

  • Tom

    As another drummer, I agree with Danny about his preference for Molter on the drums and I think I can sum up my reasoning in one word: feel. In the same way that Dave Grohl is simply a better drummer than the technically superior Taylor Hawkins, Molter’s phrasing and style simply win out over Becker’s frankly kick-ass technique and precision (in my opinion). It’s analogous to Joe Morello’s drumming for the Dave Brubeck Quartet’s album Time Out — sure, other guys can play more complicated stuff, but with Morello and Molter, every hit is exactly where and as it should be; no more, no less.

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>